Celebrating 1st National Intersex Human Rights Day

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF SRISHTI MADURAI: RECOMMENDATIONS ON INTERSEX RIGHTS IN INDIA BY THE UNITED NATIONS TREATY BODY ON DISABILITY RIGHTS

22nd Session CRPD reviewing India, UNHRC, Geneva

Srishti Madurai welcomes the recommendations made by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities with respect to intersex rights while considering the initial report of India. In particular, we heartily welcome the concluding observations calling India to “adopt measures to prevent sex assignment or “sex normalizing” surgeries, bullying and stigmatization against intersex children, ensuring their rights to preserve their physical and mental integrity.”  

The Committee arrived at these conclusions after considering the reports presented by the Indian delegation and civil society organisations presented in the 22^nd Session of the Working Group of the Committee at the United Nations (Geneva).

Along with NNID Netherlands, Srishti Madurai made a joint submission report on rights of intersex children in India before the UN committee. In our report, we highlighted the non-necessary medical attention and discrimination faced by intersex persons in India.

Expressing concerns about the “mercy killings” of intersex children with disabilities, the UN Committee has also recommended the government to “protect intersex children from attacks against their lives and any related harmful practices and adopt measures to prevent the executions of persons with disabilities in relation to violence and armed conflict.”

As a human rights treaty body comprised of experts from around the world, we are hopeful that these observations and recommendations will receive due consideration from Government of India.

Inclusion of intersex issues in the concluding observations by a human rights treaty body is a momentous development for the intersex human rights movement in India. It is important to highlight that prior to the publication of these findings; the state of Tamil Nadu has already issued a Government Order last month to ban non-necessary surgical interventions on intersex children.

We hope that the recommendations would encourage the government to take an active role in the protection of intersex people by legally prohibiting the unnecessary surgical and medical treatment of intersex people without their personal informed consent at the national level. By acting on these recommendations, India could become the first state in the world to have a protection regime for bodily integrity of intersex persons.

To ensure the follow-up on these recommendations, we are planning to engage with the  Indian Union Government and different Indian state governments in making the legal protection regime for intersex persons more effective. This is the first time the Republic of India is getting a strong recommendation on Intersex Human Rights from the UNHRC Treaty Bodies Committee. 

To read the full recommendations from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights : https://bit.ly/2ln0Ifn

Published by the Executive Director of Srishti Madurai

CELEBRATING NINE YEARS OF SRISHTI MADURAI’S JOURNEY IN SERVICE OF TRUTH (DHARMA) AND JUSTICE

Namaste/Vanakam

Love and greetings from Srishti Madurai!

Wish you happy Ganesh Chaturthi / VinayakaChaturthi

On 2^nd September 2019, we are celebrating nine years of our journey as India’s first Genderqueer and Intersex led human rights movement. We began our journey with a humble aim to create a space for Genderqueer, Intersex and LGBTQA+ Indians in the public discourse. Through its activities, Srishti Madurai has continuously worked to generate discussions, solution-oriented research, scholarship and publications on SOGIESC issues in Tamil Nadu/India. 

At every step in the journey, we have made an attempt to engage constructively with all stakeholders to work towards holistic protection of human rights of LGBTQIA+ and Genderqueer people. We’ve tried to fill crucial gaps in law and policy by bringing into focus the rights of Intersex persons as per India’s constitutional scheme.   

As a self funded volunteer based movement/organisation, none of our accomplishments would have been possible without the overwhelming love and support we got from people of all walks of life. We are deeply grateful to everyone- all individuals and organisations who have supported us in our work so far.

Special mention of thanks and gratitude to the support we received from OII Chinese Taiwan, IHF the Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice, Intersex Asia, COC Netherlands and NNID.

The journey so far…

On 2011 September 2 a handful of student volunteer team inspired by each other in Madurai started a forum for non-binary, genderqueer & Intersex people in Madurai we named our team as Srishti Madurai inspired by Anjali Gopalan.

2012: Our movement started with a 24X7 phone helpline for genderqueer people in three South Indian languages. In the same year, Srishti Madurai organized the Alan Turing Rainbow Festival 2012 which was essentially a Genderqueer Education festival to mark the birth centenary celebrations of Alan Turing. We reached out to more than 600 school children in Madurai. In the same year, we organised Asia’s first genderqueer pride festival which included participation of Anjali Gopalan, A. Revathi ma and several key persons.  

2013: In this year, we took up the case of Champion Athlete Santhi Soundarajan who is now one of the committee members of Srishti Madurai. Regional Tamil terms for Genderqueer identities were coined by Team Srishti Madurai at the American College, Introduced Gay literature, and Transgender literature as part of curriculum at the American College in Madurai.

Srishti Madurai started offering courses on Indian Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, Trekking Team of Srishti Madurai started monthly Trekking events for Madurai queer community and allies to discover the History of Madurai in SOGIESC lens.  

2014: First Tamil book on LGBTQIA+ genderqueer rights was published, this book was launched by Tamil Nadu BJP leader Srimathi Vanathi Srinivasan in the presence of several volunteers from RSS. Later, this book became part of the curriculum for Intersex Human Rights Studies for Tamil PG Research Department at the American College in Madurai. Now, this book is also available in all public libraries in Singapore. It has created strong influence in Tamil diaspora in the South Asian region. 

Team Srishti Madurai theatre performance on Bio Art - Genesis was initiated by John Marshal

Team Srishti Madurai started the Kannagi Study Circle to spread the Tamil Philosophy in SOGIESC perspectives.

2015- Srishti Madurai was invited to witness the passage of the Transgender person’s Rights Bill presented by Tiruchi Siva in the Rajya Sabha (Parliament of India).

Srishti Madurai requested MPs from both upper and lower house of Parliament of India to present the issues pertained to intersex human rights in India.

2016- Justice for Santhi campaign was initiated by Srishti Madurai to highlight the discrimination faced by Female Athletes, the campaign reached more than 1 Million people. Srishti Madurai was instrumental in getting a Government Order for  (permanent job) Santhi Soundarajan as athletic coach in Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu.

Srishti Madurai started awareness campaign to educate law makers, policy makers, politicians, medical practitioners, academicians, and media people on Intersex Human Rights.

Srishti Madurai launched a important petition to ban sex selective surgeries on infants born with Intersex traits to the National Human Rights Commission of India.

2017- Srishti Madurai started engaging with various Religious bodies and faith communities to create awareness on SOGIESC issues.

Srishti Madurai engaged with Buddhist, Jain, Islamic faith leaders/communities and also with the National Council for Churches in India. JM John Marshal and Gopi Shankar contributed to various interfaith dialogues and primary book project to educate the religious leaders from the church on SOGIESC. Especially Srishti Madurai contributed to the book “Definitions- Understanding Gender, Sex, and Sexuality. A Theological Reader on Human Sexuality and Gender Diversities: Envisioning Inclusivity”

Srishti Madurai was part of Madrid Summit 2017 and World Pride, Madrid, Spain.

Srishti Madurai was one of the signatories and key speaker at Madrid Summit Declaration along with the officials from the UNESCO, the EU parliament and the UN. Also politicians from 11 EU countries were present in this event.

Srishti Madurai was invited to ILGA Asia Regional Conference at Cambodia- first time Intersex Human Rights in India was discussed at the Asian forum.

Gopi Shankar Madurai was elected as Intersex Representative and Executive Board Member of ILGA Asia region

Our former Trustee and advisory board member Nandini Murali penned the book – Life in In Trans Activism A. Revathi - by Zubaan Publication.

Self-funded till 2017

2018- main focus-

Srishti Madurai became one of the founding members of Intersex Asia (Asia’s first collective forum for Intersex activists, individuals and Intersex led organisations) in Bangkok

Students from more than 12 countries visited Srishti Madurai for learning SOGIESC issues in Indic perspective, Inspired number of scholars

Srishti Madurai organised the Matrixial Intersex Festival supported by the Intersex Human Rights Fund, Dr. Bracha Ettinger renowned scholar delivered the key note address. 

2019: OII Chinese Taiwan and RFSL Sweden supported Srishti Madurai to attend ILGA World Conference in Wellington- for the first time Intersex Youth Panel was formed and Gopi Shankar Madurai was elected to the Youth Steering Committee of ILGA World.  

Volunteers from Srishti Madurai for the first time attended the ILGA Asia conference in Seoul & 2^nd Asian Intersex Forum at Seoul, South Korea.

Srishti Madurai inspired the landmark judgment from the Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) to ban sex selective surgeries on Intersex Infants/Children in Tamil Nadu which directed the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of Tamil Nadu to pass a Government Order within 8 weeks from the court order.

Srishti Madurai jointly with Intersex Asia organised 1st ever policy briefing meeting to  pass the Government Order, was co sponsored by COC Netherlands.

Srishti Madurai along with NNID Netherlands jointly submits a report in CRPD treaty bodies meeting on September 2 2019 sponsored by COC Netherlands.

Historic Victory 
The State Government of Tamil Nadu, India passed a Government Order to ban sex selective surgeries on Intersex infants with the inputs from Srishti Madurai 

No words can express our sincere gratitude and appreciation for the overwhelming support and kindness everybody showed to Srishti Madurai.

One by one each day flew by, 9 years of memories that you shared with Srishti Madurai, volunteers who were with us to share/organise/celebrate big events and holidays, to simple daily pleasures. Some tearful times along Srishti Madurai’s way, some joy that can’t be measured. 

9 years now gone, but still our gratitude makes sense of our past, brings peace for today, and trying to create a space to celebrate who we are. 

These 9 years of service made us to take a baby step to bring up a social space for Intersex, Genderqueer and LGBTQA+ task not just in Madurai but also in Asia. So far, we have organised/were part of more than 100 seminars, conferences on SOGIESC topics, created impact with more than 300,000 students, coined Tamil terms for SOGIESC identities under Genderqueer umbrella.

Today, in Srishti Madurai we are entering the 10th year of our existence. It’s a moment of great blessing for us to serve this cause. Also, today (2019 September 02) we are presenting our joint submission report on human rights of intersex children in India at the treaty bodies meeting at United Nations in Geneva.

Bless us, Be with us in this non-static journey.

Jai Ma (Hailing the Mother Creation)

Published on Vinayakar Chathurthi (September 02 2019), approved by the Executive Director of Srishti Madurai 

STATEMENT FROM SRISHTI MADURAI: WELCOMING THE GOVERNMENT ORDER ISSUED BY TAMIL NADU GOVERNMENT BANNING THE SEX REASSIGNMENT SURGERIES ON INTERSEX CHILDREN

Srishti Madurai welcomes the Government Order (GO) issued by Tamil Nadu government banning the practice of sex reassignment surgeries on intersex children except on life-threatening situations. The Directorate of Medical Education (DME) has been entrusted with a task of appointing a committee to determine the ‘life-threatening situation’. The Order also prescribes the composition of the committee.

The Order includes a specific directive for DME to ensure that the exceptional clause is not misused in any way which affects the implementation of the ban.

It is a moment of great pride for Tamil Nadu as it has become the first state in India to have guidelines for the protection of human rights of intersex infants. We congratulate the Health and Family Department for respecting the spirit of the historic judgment by the Madras High Court. Earlier this April, the Court had directed the government to pass a GO banning non-necessary medical surgeries on intersex children.

Recommendations

In our view, this is a first major normative step towards a comprehensive legal protection regime for intersex children. While we welcome this measure, we have few recommendations for strengthening the enforcement mechanism of the order.

Ø Need for a Clarification/Guidance Note:

Being an executive action, it is but natural for the GO to have limitations. Till the time a comprehensive law is enacted on this issue, the implementation of the Government Order can be strengthened by issuing a Clarification/Guidance Note which should include the following:

·        Listing specific medical surgeries which have been banned

·        Prescribe a Standard Medical Protocol and accreditation process for Specialized Centres

·        Prescribe Guiding Principles for the Committee constituted by DME

·        Rules for Conduct of Business for the Committee constituted by DME

·        Directive to give special attention to concerns of intersex community

·        Include a Penal clause for violation of the ban

Ø Committee to determine ‘life-threatening situation’ be made Multi-disciplinary and Include Medical Geneticist

The GO has prescribed the following composition of the committee which has to be constituted by DME- (1) Paediatric Surgeon/Urologist (2) Endocrinologist (3) Social Worker/Psychology Worker/Intersex Activist and a (4) Government Representative.

We recommend that Medical Geneticist must be included in the Committee so as to better inform the whole process of determining ‘life-threatening situation.’ World over, the view of medical geneticist is given due consideration on this subject.

Ø End discrimination based on nomenclature and terminology:

It should also contain a direction for medical professionals to ensure that intersex traits are not characterised as “disorders of sex development.” Further, intersex traits should not be considered as genetic defects/genetic disorders and terms like ‘gender dysphoria’ should not be used to characterise experience of intersex persons.

Ø Taking into account the health needs of intersex children

On 29 July 2019, the Hon’ble Health Minister of Tamil Nadu, India highlighted the urgent need to cater to the health needs of intersex children and persons in the State Legislative Assembly.

We recommend that all persons seeking psycho-social counselling, support and medical interventions relating to sex or gender should be given expert sensitive and individually tailored support by psychologists and medical practitioners or peer counselling. Such support should extend from the date of diagnosis or self-referral for as long as necessary. A special Intersex support group should be established involving social workers, intersex activists etc. with a helpline for counselling of parents, children, adolescents.

Way forward

At Srishti Madurai, we are delighted that our continuous advocacy efforts have contributed to policy-making process. After the judgment was delivered in April, we have made every possible effort to assist the government to draft the policy. Going forward, we hope to build on this progress with renewed energy and petition the Union Government to enact a Central law in this regard for protecting the dignity of intersex persons.

In particular, we are pleased to note that the government has adopted some of our recommendations in the Order like the definition of ‘intersex’. We are optimistic that our recommendations will be given due regarded by the government.

At this moment, we reiterate our commitment to work with the government at the state level and national level in making the legal protection regime more effective to fulfill the normative articulation of the NALSA judgment and the Madras High Court judgment.

We are hopeful that this development will inspire the Union Government to come up with a nation-wide comprehensive legislation which takes into account human rights of intersex persons across India. Such a law must recognize the normative principles as laid down in the judgments of the Supreme Court and also the Madras High Court. It is also necessary that the legislation is drafted in consultation with all relevant stakeholders. The consultation process must include deliberations on concerns of the intersex community, ethical and health related concerns of medical professionals and genetic scientists.     

Published on 28th August 2019, approved by the Executive Director of Srishti Madurai

Understanding Intersex Human Rights in India - NMML Lecture Series, Delhi

Understanding Intersex Human Rights in India at NMML, Delhi by Shri Gopi Shankar Madurai Chair: Smt. Sandhya Jain Senior Fellow, NMML

Event Information on NMML Official Website

Suggestions by Srishti Madurai The Transgender Person's Bill, 2019

I.                   Introduction

The aim of this submission by Srishti Madurai is to inform the Parliament of India about the required changes in the Transgender Bill, 2019 (“The Bill”). In the NALSA judgment, the Supreme Court had directed the Union and the state governments to undertake steps to fulfil the mandate of the judgment. In particular, the judgment declared the need for legal gender recognition of transgender persons. The Court also recognised the obligation of the government to address the needs of persons who did not conform to binary notion of gender identity- male or female. The judgment also recommended the government to adopt anti-discriminatory and social welfare measures.

With the bill, the Union government has an opportunity to ensure fundamental rights are guaranteed to all persons regardless of their sex characteristics and gender identity. However, the bill has not lived up to the mandate of the normative articulation in the NALSA judgment and hence, it suffers from serious flaws. In this submission, we hope to offer concrete suggestions regarding each of the chapters in the bill. Here’s a summary of our suggestions.

·         The title of the current bill should be “Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill”.

·         The definition of ‘transgender persons’ needs to draw distinction between transgender persons and intersex persons. 

·         The bill should prohibit non-necessary and non-consensual sex selective surgeries and sex reassignment surgeries and also make it an offence.

·         The bill should also provide for setting up a Working Group on Intersex Persons.

·         The bill should clearly identify the specific health needs of transgender persons and intersex persons.

II.                Suggestions for Chapter-I

·         Title: The title of the current bill should be “Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics (Protection of Rights) Bill”. The title of the current bill is “The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019”. In our view, the title of the bill does not fulfil the mandate of the NALSA judgment which spoke about the need of legal protection of all persons who did not conform to binary notions of gender identity.

The current title of the bill is exclusionary in its current form as it does not accommodate all persons whose legal protection it seeks to recognise. The bill is also expected to address the needs of intersex persons. However, the current title does not give the impression that it accounts for protection of rights of intersex persons.

·         Definition of ‘Transgender persons’:

The current bill provides for the following definition:

“a  person  whose  gender  does  not  match  with the  gender  assigned  to  that  person  at  birth  and  includes  trans-man  or  trans-woman(whether or not such person has undergone Sex Reassignment Surgery or hormonetherapy or laser therapy or such other therapy), person with intersex variations, gender-queer  and  person  having  such  socio-cultural  identities  as  kinner,  hijra,  aravani  and jogta.”

The current bill conflates the condition of intersex persons with transgender persons by incorporating them under the same category. World over, there is a clearly recognised scientific distinction between the transgender persons and intersex persons. Barring few overlaps, the legal and welfare needs of intersex persons are different from those of transgender persons. Therefore, the definition should highlight this distinction between transgender persons and intersex persons enabling them to exercise the rights which they are entitled to. Some infants/persons born or living with intersex traits can live with a non-binary identity or may choose to

The bill should also provide for definition of key terms- ‘gender identity’, ‘gender expression’ and ‘sex characteristics’.

III.             Suggestions for Chapter-II-Prohibition of certain acts

This chapter essentially prescribes anti-discriminatory norms for persons and establishment under specified contexts.

·         End discrimination based on nomenclature and terminology: It should also contain a direction for medical professionals to ensure that intersex traits are not characterised as “disorders of sex development.” Further, intersex traits should not be considered as genetic defects or genetic disorders.

·         Prohibition of non-compulsory and non-consensual Sex Selective Surgeries/Sex Reassignment Surgeries: It shall be unlawful for medical practitioners or other professionals to conduct any sex reversal treatment and/or surgical intervention on the sex characteristics of a minor which treatment and/or intervention can be deferred until the person to be treated can provide informed consent: Provided that such sex assignment treatment and, or surgical intervention on the sex characteristics of the minor shall be conducted if the minor gives informed consent through the person exercising parental authority or the tutor of the minor. 

Such Medical or Surgical Treatment should be undertaken only in specialised centres which have Multi-disciplinary clinical team. The specific nature of the intervention should be taken as a consensus by this multi-disciplinary team of experts with experience in handling intersex conditions and should be guided by standard medical protocols. For exceptional cases, where the decision-making is difficult, should be referred to Government working group/ committee for approval.

IV.             Suggestions for Chapter III-Recognition of Identity of Transgender Persons

Even after the NALSA judgment which declared that medical procedures are not a necessity for self-identification, the Health Ministry has admitted that medical procedure including sex reassignment surgeries are being done in India. The Ministry has given the justification that it is only done after thorough assessment of the patient, obtaining justification for the procedure planned to be conducted with the help of appropriate diagnostic test and only after taking a written consent of the patient/guardian.

When this response was presented before the High Court of Madras in the case of Arunkumar and Sreeja v. The Inspector General of Registration and Ors., it slammed the Health Ministry and imposed a ban on the practice of SRS on intersex infants/children. The Court held that the consent of the parent cannot be considered as the consent of the child. Hence, such surgeries should be prohibited.

Recognising the mandate of the Madras High Court judgment and the NALSA judgment (Direction 5, para 129)., the bill must ban such medical procedures to ensure that transgender persons and intersex persons are not compelled to undergo such unnecessary medical procedures for recognition of identity.

V.                Suggestions for Chapter IV-Welfare Measures by Government

The bill should prescribe specific measures to address education needs and health needs of transgender and intersex persons. Further, the bill should also prescribe provisions to ensure compliance of anti-discrimination measures in labour markets. In each sector, there should be specific laws prohibiting discriminatory practices on the basis of gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics.

The Mental Healthcare Bill, 2016 and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Bill, 2014 provide an acceptable template for this chapter as they recognise specific areas of welfare such as education, health, employment, insurance, pension, food security and sanitation.

VI.             Suggestions for Chapter V-Obligations of Establishments and Other Person

In this section, the right to bodily integrity of transgender persons and intersex persons must be recognised in a way that no establishment shall ever compel any individual to undergo any non-consensual and non-necessary medical procedure.

VII.          Suggestions for Chapter VI- Education, Social Security and Health of Transgender Person

·         Education: In this chapter, specific revision of existing laws and regulations must be mandated so as to prevent discrimination in the form of bullying or harassment in educational institutions based on gender identity and sex characteristics. Special measures must be taken to ensure that transgender persons and intersex persons do not face any discrimination while appearing for competitive exams for jobs in public services. Further, this provision should prescribe training of schoolteachers and staff in educational institutions. The curriculum of textbooks also needs to be revised so as to ensure inclusive education.

·         Health: In this chapter, distinct health needs of transgender and intersex persons needs to be identified. Genetic counselling/consultation to be integral part of clinics for intersex persons. Training programs should be designed suitably to be address intersex/DSD issues.

All persons seeking psycho social counselling, support and medical interventions relating to sex or gender should be given expert sensitive and individually tailored support by psychologists and medical practitioners or peer counselling.

The government should introduce indigenous medical knowledge like ayurvedic counselling along with allopathic medicine. Our civilizational ethos never treated conditions of gender variants as any kind of disorder/mental health/dysphoria.

·         Society Security: Social security needs of the transgender persons and intersex persons must be clearly identified and listed down in the law in a non-exhaustive manner.

The government should be obligated by law to prepare resource and informative materials in all Indian languages pertaining to the awareness on issues related to transgender persons and intersex persons. This material must be disseminated to parents, educational institutions and to the general public. In addition to preparation of material, the Ministry in charge must be obligated by law to conduct adequate awareness programmes in all parts of the country on regular interval through different public authorities.

VIII.       Suggestions for Chapter VII- National Council for Transgender Persons

This chapter provides for the institutional framework for protection of rights of transgender persons. There should be a specific working group for intersex persons. It should include member of the medical profession as well as genetic scientists.

Composition of Working group on Intersex:

·         The working group shall consist of a Chairperson and nine members.

·         Two persons as chair. One- Medical geneticist- 15 years of experience. Second- The Chairperson shall be a Professor or Senior Associate Professor of Paediatric surgery from a Government medical College with at least twelve years of experience in dealing with intersex conditions

·         The nine members shall be five medical personnel from government or private sector (paediatrician, paediatric surgeon /urologist, paediatric endocrinologist, genetic scientist, plus a doctor representing department of health) and four non-medical experts (one human rights expert, one expert in Community Health and medical ethicsist one medical sociologists/ psychologist and one lawyer specialised in Indian Constitutional law.

IX.              Suggestions for Chapter VIII-Offences and Penalties

·         The law should prescribe punishment for those persons and establishment who perform any non-consensual and non-necessary sex selective surgeries on infants/children.